Nimesha Sahani, J; Chan, D W M and Kumaraswamy, M (2021) A systematic literature review and analysis towards developing PPP models for delivering smart infrastructure. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(1), pp. 121-137. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Rising human aspirations leading to rapid urbanisation, amidst climate changes and other environmental pressures have aggravated the needs for better-focused sustainable urban development in general as well as for smart and sustainable cities in particular. Indeed, smart infrastructure (SI) development is a prerequisite for smart cities (SCs). However, inadequate funding and expertise for such SI development pose profound challenges that may be partially addressed by mobilising private finance and efficiencies through collaborative public-private partnership (PPP) models. This paper provides a holistic review and analysis of the relevant literature, as a basis for proposing such PPP models for developing SI. A systematic literature review helped to fulfil the aim of this paper in the first phase of the underlying longer-term study. Authoritative search engines like Scopus and Web of Science indexed articles were reviewed and analysed, 85% of these being journal articles. SCs that necessarily include SI are important in overcoming current urban challenges in developing and developed countries. Given shortfalls in traditional procurement and funding models, special PPP models are required for SI development. After identifying the relevant needs, drivers, barriers and challenges in different countries, a general indicative framework is developed to illustrate how the various interacting force fields can be harnessed to develop the envisaged PPP models that can complement non-PPP procurement models. PPP for SI development is a relatively new, hence, under-researched topic. This desktop review and analysis provide a useful launching pad for the development of SI through overcoming the potential challenges in traditional procurement and financial models.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | public-private partnership; smart cities; urbanization; procurement; infrastructure; environmental changes; climate change; urban development; quality of life; sustainable development |
| Index terms: | launching pad, developing and developed country, urban development, sustainable city, efficiency, partnership, climate change, smart city, environmental change, urbanization, sustainable urban development, smart infrastructure, private finance, traditional procurement, sustainable development, funding, science, systematic literature review, quality of life, journal, search engines |
| Subjects: | economic development, urban design, information science, systems engineering, sustainability and resilience, specialized education, health safety and environment, infrastructure and transport systems, urban planning, public and environmental health, contractual arrangements, research evaluation and metrics, performance management, research dissemination and communication, economic analysis, urban sustainability, climate science, partnership management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Digital Applications, Education, Quality Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, International Construction, Business Strategy, Procurement, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here