Ottou, J A; Baiden, B K; Nani, G and Martin Morgan, T (2021) Benefits of implementing six sigma in competitive tendering process. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), pp. 214-230. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
This research investigates the implementation of Six Sigma in competitive tendering processes to address persistent delays by identifying the potential benefits and challenges of implementing Six Sigma in construction competitive tendering processes. The results seek to encourage practitioners to implement Six Sigma in addressing competitive tendering process delays. Literature was reviewed to identify the benefits and challenges of Six Sigma implementation in construction processes and categorized under broad headings. Three case studies were used to authenticate the literature findings by applying Define-Measure-Analyse-Improve-Control to their construction competitive tendering processes. Furthermore, quality tools and techniques together with documentary analysis, content analysis and determination of frequencies of quantitised qualitative data were employed to identify potential benefits and challenges. The most common Six Sigma benefits achievable in construction competitive tendering are Time Related benefits. Other benefits likely to emanate as ripple effects are Customer Focus Related, Quality Related, Process Improvement Related, Human Resource Related, Finance Related and Decision Related. However, implementation challenges should be expected. Six Sigma implementation in construction competitive tendering promotes time efficiency. It is expected that this will encourage quantity surveyors, procurement practitioners and their institutions to implement Six Sigma in addressing persistent delays in their competitive tendering processes. This paper demonstrates the use of merged approach under mixed method to identify the benefits and challenges of Six Sigma implementation in construction competitive tendering process within the Ghanaian context.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitive tendering; delays; six sigma; quantity surveying; qualitative analysis; job satisfaction; human resources; tendering; decision making; content analysis; competition; Ghana |
| Index terms: | human resource, implementation, case study, practitioner, time efficiency, competitive tendering, competition, construction process, quantity surveying, Ghana, process improvement, documentary analysis, mixed method, job satisfaction, content analysis, six sigma, surveying, qualitative analysis, decision-making |
| Subjects: | tendering, health monitoring assessment and metrics, performance measurement, contractual arrangements, management, research design and methodology, profession, data collection methods, market analysis, data analysis and analytics, data science, decision analysis, building construction, practitioner, Geography |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Procurement, Site Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here