Sun, J; Balakrishnan, S and Zhang, Z (2021) A resource allocation framework for predisaster resilience management of interdependent infrastructure networks. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), pp. 284-303. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Resource allocation is essential to infrastructure management. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodological framework for resource allocation that takes interdependencies among infrastructure systems into consideration to minimize the overall impact of infrastructure network disruptions due to extreme events. Taking advantage of agent-based modeling techniques, the proposed methodology estimates the interdependent effects of a given infrastructure failure which are then used to optimize resource allocation such that the network-level resilience is maximized. The findings of the study show that allocating resources with the proposed methodology, where optimal infrastructure reinforcement interventions are implemented, can improve the resilience of infrastructure networks with respect to both direct and interdependent risks of extreme events. These findings are also verified by the results of two case studies. As the two case studies have shown, the proposed methodological framework can be applied to the resource allocation process in asset management practices.Social implicationsThe proposed methodology improves the resilience of the infrastructure network, which can alleviate the social and economic impact of extreme events on communities. Capitalizing on the combination of agent-based modeling and simulation-based optimization techniques, this study fulfills a critical gap in infrastructure asset management by incorporating infrastructure interdependence and resilience concepts into the resource allocation process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure resilience; agent-based modelling; simulation-based optimization; critical infrastructure; case studies; infrastructure; impact analysis; disasters; absorptive capacity; power plants |
| Index terms: | impact analysis, interdependence, critical infrastructure, estimate, economic impact, reinforcement, methodology, asset management, agent-based modelling, power plant, infrastructure management, absorptive capacity, case study, simulation-based optimization, infrastructure resilience, extreme event, resource allocation, infrastructure asset management |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, resource management, financial and cost management, modelling and simulation, building materials, risk management, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, financial analysis, environmental hazards, organizational analysis, asset management, infrastructure engineering, theoretical framing, research methods, algorithms |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here