Project stakeholder's engagement and performance: A comparison between complex and non-complex projects using SEM

Tuan Son, N; Sherif, M and Mostafa, S (2021) Project stakeholder's engagement and performance: A comparison between complex and non-complex projects using SEM. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(5), pp. 804-818. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

The large number of stakeholders in a project is a source of complexity because their inter-relationships can lead to complex interactions, an inadequate understanding of the other stakeholders and conflicting stakeholder interests. Although several studies have investigated the role and effects of engaging stakeholders in improving project success, studies examining the relationships between stakeholder engagement (SE) and quantitative and qualitative project performance (PP) in complex projects (CPs) have been limited. This study empirically examined the relationships between SE and project performance within complex and non-CP contexts. The study used an extensive literature review to develop the conceptual model. The study identified 22 factors of measuring SE and project performance's association within the context of CPs. The literature review followed by a questionnaire survey to collect data from quantifying the relationships. One hundred forty-four responses were received from project managers in different locations. The response data were subjected to structural equation modelling analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to evaluate the measurements model. The current study generated several key findings. In the context of CPs, SE was found to negatively affect quantitative PP but to positively and significantly affect qualitative PP. In non-CPs, SE also positively affects qualitative PP. Further, in the context of CPs, SE negatively affects schedule performance, whereas no significant relationship was found between the two variables in non-CPs. In terms of cost performance, no significant relationship was observed between SE and cost performance for either group. This research provides insight into differences in the relationship(s) between SE and PP in non-complex and CPs. The research also makes recommendations for project team members.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: stakeholder engagement; complex projects; project performance; structural equation modelling; factor analysis; decision making; multivariate statistical analysis; complexity; stakeholders
Index terms: project success, project manager, schedule performance, structural equation modelling, literature review, confirmatory factor analysis, survey, multivariate statistical analysis, decision-making, questionnaire, factor analysis, project performance, stakeholder engagement, project stakeholder, complex project, interaction, project team, cost performance, complexity
Subjects: project management theory and practice, economics, systems engineering, statistical analysis, behavioral psychology, decision analysis, sociology, project controls, community and social dimensions, profession, data collection methods, project delivery, strategic project management, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Time Control, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here