The alignment of the open innovation process and the project lifecycle

AlHarmoodi, S M and Dulaimi, M (2022) The alignment of the open innovation process and the project lifecycle. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(4), pp. 556-572. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: This research study aims to develop an alignment model based on a literature review that explains the association between the construction project lifecycle and the innovation process, while considering the integration of all stakeholders in the process in an open innovation context. Design/methodology/approach: The authors conduct an extensive review of the open innovation and the construction project management literature to establish an alignment model through the investigation and analysis of the current scholarly contributions. This research study is based on a theoretical framework; thus, it has not utilized any primary data. Moreover, data collected for this research study was obtained from reliable literary sources. Findings: The study presents an alignment model that has uncovered a strong correlation between project activities, stakeholder integration and innovation. The authors revealed critical factors that require an enhanced inter- and intra-collaboration between the various stakeholders and team members to achieve an effective innovation process in a project context. Originality/value: This study provides a previously unexplored alignment between the project lifecycle and the innovation process. It signifies several critical factors that influence the effectiveness of innovations in a construction project context. Furthermore, it identifies different zones and knowledge transfer gates that necessitate proper leadership, stakeholder integration and team dynamics throughout the project lifecycle.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction projects; innovation effectiveness; innovation process; open innovation; project lifecycle; stakeholder integration
Index terms: literature review, project lifecycle, critical factor, construction project, collaboration, methodology, integration, investigation, construction project management, lifecycle, team dynamics, effectiveness, knowledge transfer, stakeholder integration
Subjects: organizational analysis, performance management, research methods, management, project management theory and practice, production management, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, participation process, project completion, risk assessment, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here