Blismas, N G; Pendlebury, M; Gibb, A and Pasquire, C (2005) Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1(3), pp. 153-162. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Off-site production (OSP) has been promoted as one of the solutions to the industry's performance problems. Numerous works have demonstrated the possible benefits of adopting such approaches to construction projects, yet uptake has been slow. Addressing these concerns, a series of factors were identified that affect the use of OSP within construction projects. From these factors a pattern emerged in which some factors drove OSP adoption, whereas others constrained its implementation. These constraints were investigated further using a questionnaire survey that was sent to all major stakeholders, ranging from clients through to end manufacturers. The extent to which the constraints inhibit the use of OSP were ascertained, scored and ranked. Four broad constraint themes emerged from the findings, namely process, value, supply-chain and knowledge constraints. A model illustrating the relationship between the four themes provides further insight into the constraints to OSP uptake. The authors further suggest that a broader understanding of the constraints is required, arguing that although OSP can contribute to change in the industry, it itself depends on change in order to be widely adopted.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constraints; mitigation; off-site production; prefabrication; value |
| Index terms: | manufacturer, survey, off-site production, construction project, mitigation, questionnaire, implementation, prefabrication |
| Subjects: | manufacturing engineering, financial risk, production management, building construction, data collection methods, practitioner, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here