Integrating risk management's best practices to estimate deep excavation projects' time and cost

Heravi, G; Taherkhani, A H; Sobhkhiz, S; Mashhadi, A H and Zahiri-Hashemi, R (2022) Integrating risk management's best practices to estimate deep excavation projects' time and cost. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(2), pp. 180-204. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

This study provides an integrated risk-based cost and time estimation approach for deep excavation projects. The purpose is to identify the best practices in recent advances of excavation risk analysis (RA) and integrate them with traditional cost and time estimation methods. The implemented best practices in this research are as follows: (1) fault-tree analysis (FTA) for risk identification (RI); (2) Bayesian belief networks (BBNs), fuzzy comprehensive analysis and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) for risk analysis; and (3) sensitivity analysis and root-cause analysis (RCA) for risk response planning (RRP). The proposed approach is applied in an actual deep excavation project in Tehran, Iran. The results show that the framework proposes a practical approach for integrating the risk management (RM) best practices in the domain of excavation projects with traditional cost and time estimation approaches. The proposed approach can consider the interrelationships between risk events and identify their root causes. Further, the approach engages different stakeholders in the process of RM, which is beneficial for determining risk owners and responsibilities. This research contributes to the project management body of knowledge by integrating recent RM best practices in deep excavation projects for probabilistic estimation of project time and cost.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: deep excavation; risk management; fuzzy method; Bayesian belief networks; fault-tree analysis; root cause analysis; construction costs; risk analysis; Monte Carlo simulation; Bayesian analysis
Index terms: excavation, risk management, fault-tree analysis, best practice, root cause analysis, project management, time estimation, risk analysis, deep excavation, fuzzy method, body of knowledge, estimate, sensitivity analysis, Tehran, estimation, risk response, bayesian belief network, risk identification, Bayesian analysis, construction cost, Monte Carlo simulation, owner
Subjects: environmental hazards, statistical analysis, probabilistic model, sociology, geotechnical engineering, project management theory and practice, financial risk, Geography, financial and cost management, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, modelling and simulation, operations research, risk management, business, risk assessment
Topics: Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here