A hierarchical design optimization approach for meeting building performance targets

Choudhary, R; Papalambros, P Y and Malkawi, A (2005) A hierarchical design optimization approach for meeting building performance targets. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1(1), pp. 57-76. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

This paper builds on the premise that numerical optimization techniques can improve the decision-making process and structure the use of analysis tools in simulation-based building design. The main goal of this paper is to demonstrate the use of the numerical optimization paradigm for supporting consistency between multiple decisionmaking tasks in simulation-based design scenarios. As an outcome, a set of interrelated design-analysis tasks are posed in a multi-level, multidisciplinary, hierarchical design optimization framework called Analytic Target Cascading (ATC). This paper discusses how ATC functions through the thermal and HVAC design of one floor in a healthcare facility. This thermal and HVAC design problem is based on a survey of an existing healthcare unit and is therefore a realistic representation of a design consulting task. It includes zones that have varying functional requirements and different thermal conditions, and is sufficiently complex for demonstrating both the merits and limitations of the ATC approach in the context of simulation-based decision-making in building design. Decision models formulated for this study incorporate performance targets for AHU capacity, energy consumption, thermal comfort and airflow. Hence, it shows how dependencies between HVAC, energy and thermal comfort, and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis tools can be co-ordinated within the ATC process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: analytic target cascading; building performance; building simulation; hierarchical optimization; systems design
Index terms: paradigm, decision-making, energy consumption, computational fluid dynamics, thermal comfort, systems design, building simulation, design optimization, optimization technique, building design, building performance, decision-making process, survey
Subjects: environmental engineering, quality assurance, decision analysis, design process, algorithms, education and knowledge transfer, architectural design, energy systems, modelling and simulation, design methods, data collection methods
Topics: Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Research Practice, Sustainability, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here