Luane Assunção Paiva, M; Clara Beatriz Ferreira de, O and Reymard Savio Sampaio de, M (2022) Allocating scarce financial resources effectively through function analysis in social housing projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), pp. 96-110. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Budget constraints faced by social housing projects (SHPs) developers can lead to poor value delivery to the end-users. Without a structured method to guide the decision-making processes during product development, SHP often fails to meet user needs and aspirations. Function analysis (FA) is an essential step in a value management (VM) study. Still, FA practice in SHP has been treated with secondary importance. This paper aims to propose a method for improving FA practice in the VM process for a Brazilian SHP to achieve optimum benefits. The research followed Design Science Research (DSR) in a specific single case study context, focusing on solving practical problems while contributing to theory. The method has 11 steps and guides a complete VM exercise. Its development was based on prior VM research. Focus group meetings were held to get feedback about the initial method's version to increase its relevancy and applicability in the studied context. The proposed method suggests that scarce financial resources in SHP do not necessarily lead to low-value delivery and low-design quality. When FA is fully implemented, opportunities for cost reallocations to enhance value are identified. VM prior research in construction has not provided a specific method for improving FA practice for social housing developers to enhance value in the context of scarce financial resources.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | social housing; value management; user needs; multidisciplinary teams; small & medium sized enterprises; cost reduction; housing; public housing; design; decision making; cost control |
| Index terms: | user need, value management, public housing, decision-making, cost control, cost reduction, housing, social housing, product development, case study, exercise, design science research, design quality, focus group, budget constraint, function analysis, decision-making process, multidisciplinary team |
| Subjects: | design practice, management, economics, housing and residential development, decision analysis, sociology, data collection methods, construction type, user-centered design, innovation studies, health behaviours and lifestyles, data science, professional practice, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Value Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here