A conceptual framework for managing post-disaster reconstruction projects in emerging economies: The case of Angola

Nyamagere Gladys, S; Rwelamila, P D and Gimbi, J J (2022) A conceptual framework for managing post-disaster reconstruction projects in emerging economies: The case of Angola. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(2), pp. 205-222. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

This study develops a conceptual framework appropriate for managing Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects (PDRPs) so as to avoid cost and time overruns in Angola. An explanatory sequential mixed research approach was used. Data was collected from project participants within the ministry of planning, the provincial government office of planning and the local government in Angola. A questionnaire with closed questions was completed by 130 survey respondents. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with seven participants selected through purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics, t-test and content analysis were used to analyse quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The study indicates that there is presently no formal project management process. Neither have government project management standards been developed and broadcast. This results in ad hoc processes being mostly used for managing PDRPs. The study further presents disaster preparation programme, community engagement, resources and stakeholder's engagement, post-disaster procurement policies, financial guides, post-disaster recovery legislation, context-specific (social economic, demographic, political and cultural variables), programme preparation as essential components to be considered for developing an appropriate framework for managing PDRPs. The study is limited by its geographical settings which focussed the results on one province in Angola. However, the findings can be useful for other countries wishing to gain insights on the framework with "overlooked components" for managing DPRPs in emerging countries with similar disaster environment, government policies and same business environment. The framework for managing PDRPs may positively impact project realization, hence minimization of time and cost overruns. The findings are vital for managers, local practitioners and policy/decision-makers in emerging countries of essential components and lessons useful for managing PDRPs and making decisions when they intend to participate in such projects. An understanding of which approaches are critical and essential components of the framework serves as a basis for improving project delivery. Future research studies should describe its practical application. The study provides insights by identifying an ordered grouped set of project management models/approaches mostly applicable for managing PDRPs in Angola, better understanding of appropriate components/variables to be considered and develops a conceptual framework for managing PDRPs in emerging countries, post-war context.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Angola; post-disaster reconstruction; nongovernmental organizations; local government; disaster recovery; procurement policy; demographic variables; content analysis; decision making
Index terms: war, government policy, project management process, decision-making, post-disaster reconstruction, questionnaire, practitioner, statistics, conceptual framework, post-disaster recovery, purposive sampling, project management, project delivery, emerging country, legislation, interview, procurement policy, local government, manager, focus group, minimization, time overrun, content analysis, cost overrun, Angola, disaster recovery, community engagement, programme, government project, post-disaster reconstruction project, survey, demographic variable, emerging economy
Subjects: post-disaster and reconstruction, algorithms, research methods, economic development, theoretical framing, project management theory and practice, development economics, Geography, conflict and crisis studies, decision analysis, emergency and crisis management, project controls, demography, administrative law, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, practitioner, community and social dimensions, public policy, project delivery, financial and cost management, legal systems, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Cost Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Procurement, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, International Construction, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here