Ogunbayo, B F; Ohis Aigbavboa, C; Thwala, W D and Akinradewo, O I (2022) Assessing maintenance budget elements for building maintenance management in Nigerian built environment: A Delphi study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(4), pp. 649-666. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: A maintenance budget is an element of maintenance management (MM) that deals with financial planning for maintenance operations and execution within a maintenance organisation. Developed countries have standardised MM structures which guides maintenance activities. This, however, cannot be said of developing countries, as there are few or no MM standards adopted. Given this contextual setting, the study aims to validate the relevance of maintenance budget (MB) elements utilised in developed countries for developing countries – using Nigeria as a case study exemplar. Also, the study further examines the effectiveness of the validated maintenance budget elements. Design/methodology/approach: The research adopts qualitative techniques and employs the Delphi survey to collect and analyse primary data from an operational perception through structured questionnaires to solicit views from panellists on the subject being assessed. A relative importance index (RII) was used in measuring consensus for the Delphi study outcomes, while a Cronbach Alpha test was carried out on all the MB elements to determine their level of reliability. Findings: The key finding from the study reveals that of the 21 elements that influence the implementation of MB, 10 elements have a very high influence on the MM of buildings (VHI: 9.00–10.00), 5 elements had a high influence (HI: 7.00–8.99) and 6 other elements scored medium impact (MI: 5.00–6.99). The elements of MB that recorded very high influence on prompt MM effectiveness include MB implementation, corruption-free maintenance process, reduction in maintenance expenditure, maintenance financial plan, cost implication of maintained asset, cash flow indexing, prioritisation of maintenance financing, maintenance funding, incorporation of financial indicators and audit of operational maintenance cost. Practical implications: On a practical note, these elements will guide the built environment professionals in organising maintenance activities to best use limited resources. Originality/value: Cumulatively, the research presented shows that these elements are similar to those of other countries. Effective MM of buildings is assured when these elements are integral to developing a MB.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; maintenance budget; maintenance management; Nigeria |
| Index terms: | building maintenance, Delphi survey, case study, developing country, cash flow, financial planning, maintenance management, Delphi method, Nigeria, audit, relative importance index, questionnaire, built environment, developed country, effectiveness, corruption, methodology, funding, maintenance cost, financing, indexing, implementation |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, financial and cost management, economic analysis, data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, professional ethics, infrastructure and transport systems, information systems, Geography, development economics, financial management, performance measurement, maintenance engineering, research methods, performance management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, International Construction, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Procurement, Risk Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here