Empirical investigation of the applicability of constructability methods to prevent design errors

Raviv, G; Shapira, A and Sacks, R (2022) Empirical investigation of the applicability of constructability methods to prevent design errors. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(1), pp. 53-69. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

The paper aims to identify the effective constructability methods and tools that should be applied during the early project design stages to prevent specific constructability failures regarding project context. Seventeen basic constructability problems were defined, 12 constructability implementation methods for investigation were selected, and a general tool representing potential causal connections between the problems and the methods that could prevent them was developed. A comparative case study was conducted through a rigorous investigation of the construction documentation of four major building construction projects. Nearly four hundred constructability problems were identified. The tool developed was used to draw conclusions about the preferred constructability methods, in general, and with respect to specific project contexts. The managerial approach offers the best methods for preventing constructability problems. The major methods that emerged were (1) assigning a constructability champion, (2) facilitating the involvement of the general contractor early in the design process, and (3) augmenting design quality control. At the other end of the scale, methods such as company procedures and owner involvement were found to be the least effective. The paper offers the ability to relate constructability problems to preventive mechanisms and to identify the appropriate steps to be taken to resolve these problems. The mechanism described here can be used by construction companies that keep failure data within accounting files to check projects in retrospect and draw lessons from them to be implemented in future projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design for constructability; highway construction; quality control; contractors; automation; project engineering; building information modelling
Index terms: general contractor, building construction, owner, design for constructability, documentation, construction company, building information modelling, design error, design quality, case study, project design, design process, constructability, automation, quality control, implementation, accounting, project engineering, highway construction, investigation
Subjects: practitioner, control systems, design methods, organization, data collection methods, economic analysis, project delivery, contractual arrangements, professional practice, professional development, automation and robotics, civil engineering, construction integration, information systems, sociology, building construction
Topics: Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here