Roy, N C and Roy, N G (2022) Sustainable hydroelectric power project planning under socio-economic and environmental concerns using index based approach. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(3), pp. 401-432. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to identify and gauge the sustainability indicators (SUSIs) for sustainable Hydroelectric Power (HEP) project development. It examines major SUSIs under the social, economic and environmental (SEE) fronts and categorizes them under push and pull impacts which helps to identify challenges and opportunities associated with projects. Additionally, the study calculates an empirical sustainability index (SI) to assess the sustainability level of HEP. Finally, the study suggests mitigation measures across stakeholders, which will optimize government/developer/investor investments. Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines the interaction of sustainable HEP development with SUSIs using Uttarakhand as a study area. Additionally, SI has been developed quantitatively. For the indicator classification, the authors conducted a literature review and secondary survey of all affected parties, including investors, developers, NGOs and villagers. The fuzzy logic theory (FLT) is used to determine the SI of the study area and classify projects in their level of sustainability. On the basis of expert opinion and literature review, mitigation measures are proposed across stakeholders. Findings: The authors found that there is a mixed effect of SUSIs on HEP development across various projects in Uttarakhand. Furthermore, the authors suggest that index-based assessment and planned collaboration play a significant role in sustainable HEP development. Mitigation measures should be suggested to all affected stakeholders based on specific project issues, i.e. collaborations, training, public awareness campaigns, and initiatives by the government that would improve sustainability conditions. Research limitations/implications: In addition to supporting the ongoing and upcoming initiatives launched by the Government of India, including the Green Energy Corridor, independent power producers (IPPs); and the India-Renewable Resources Development Project with IDA and participates in Net zero target. Practical implications: The structured, sustainable HEP planning suggested in the study will help to conserve society, economy, save resources and in parallel reduce the cost and time of developers and policymakers. This will also help to improve the socioeconomic status of the villagers and prolong the life of the project. Originality/value: The innovative SI-based push-pull approach identifies a sustainable HEP project planning.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | hydroelectric power projects; push-pull impacts; socio-economic and environmental impacts; sustainability index; sustainability indicators; sustainable assessment |
| Index terms: | project planning, project development, India, interaction, environmental impact, mitigation, collaboration, methodology, net zero, survey, environmental concern, literature review, independent power producer, fuzzy logic, sustainability indicator, society, renewable resources, investor |
| Subjects: | sociology, communities and social development, behavioral psychology, sustainability assessment, management, research methods, Geography, financial risk, environmental resource management, energy systems, data analysis and analytics, data science, project delivery, data collection methods, environmental issues, environmental impact, control systems |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Cost Management, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here