Sauni, M; Luomala, H; Kolisoja, P and Vaismaa, K (2022) Framework for implementing track deterioration analytics into railway asset management. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(6), pp. 871-886. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: Recent research outputs can be difficult to implement into ongoing safety critical processes. Hence, research is well beyond current practices in railway asset management. This paper demonstrates the process of creating tangible change within a railway asset management organization by introducing a framework for advancing track geometry deterioration analyses (TGDA) in practice. Design/methodology/approach: The research was conducted in three parts: (1) maturity models were reviewed and adapted as the basis for the framework, (2) the initial maturity level was investigated by conducting semi-structured expert interviews, and (3) a framework for development was created in cooperation with stakeholders during three workshops. The methodology and findings were tested and applied in the Finnish state rail network asset management. Findings: The main output of this study is the framework for advancing TGDA in railway asset management. The novel framework provides structure for controlled incremental development, which is essential when altering a safety critical process. Practical implications: The research process was successfully applied in Finland. Following the steps presented in this article, any organization can apply the framework to plan their development schemes for railway asset management. Originality/value: Full-scale implementation of novel models and methods is often overlooked, which prevents practical asset management from obtaining tangible benefits from research. This research provides an innovative approach in narrowing the overlooked research gap and brings research results within the reach of practitioners.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset management; deterioration; framework; maturity model; railway; track geometry |
| Index terms: | research output, Finland, asset management, workshop, maturity model, geometry, maturity level, interview, safety critical, deterioration, implementation, cooperation, practitioner, methodology |
| Subjects: | asset management, research methods, evaluation, Geography, health safety and environment, research products and data, psychology, material degradation and durability, contractual arrangements, mathematical modelling, construction type, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here