Galaitsi, S E; Rand, K; Yeates, E; Talbot, C; O'Donnell, A; Pinigina, E and Linkov, I (2023) Stakeholder collaboration in the forecast-informed reservoir operations (firo) pilot project at lake mendocino, California. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 13(6), pp. 880-895. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: Water is a critical and contentious resource in California, hence any changes in reservoir management requires coordination among many basin stakeholders. The Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO) pilot project at Lake Mendocino, California explored the viability of using weather forecasts to alter the operations of a United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) reservoir. The pilot project demonstrated FIRO's ability to improve water supply reliability, but also revealed the key role of a collaborative Steering Committee. Because Lake Mendocino's Viability Assessment did not explore the features of the Steering Committee, this study aims to examine the relationships and interactions between Steering Committee members that supported FIRO's implementation at Lake Mendocino. Design/methodology/approach: The project identified 17 key project participants who spoke at a FIRO workshop or emerged through chain-referrals. Using semi-structured interviews with these participants, the project examined the dynamics of human interactions that enabled the successful multi-institutional and multi-criteria innovation as analyzed through text-coding. Findings: The results reveal the importance for FIRO Steering Committee members to understand the limitations and constraints of stakeholder counterparts at other organizations, the importance of building and safeguarding relationships, and the role of trust and belonging between members. The lessons learned suggest several interventions to support successful group collaboration dynamics for future FIRO projects. Originality/value: This study identifies features of the Steering Committee that contributed to FIRO's success by supporting collaborative negotiations of infrastructure operations within a multi-institutional and multi-criteria context.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | semi-structured interviews; stakeholder group dynamics; text coding; water resources management |
| Index terms: | coordination, weather, negotiation, lessons learned, interaction, implementation, referral, group dynamics, reservoir, collaboration, dynamics, methodology, water resource, engineer, water supply, workshop, interview, United States |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, environmental engineering, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, conflict resolution, professional development, Geography, research methods, management, contractual arrangements, air quality, data collection methods, construction type, profession |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here