Crisis management in public–private partnerships: Lessons from the global crises in the xxi century

Castelblanco, G; Guevara, J and De Marco, A (2024) Crisis management in public–private partnerships: Lessons from the global crises in the xxi century. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 14(1), pp. 56-73. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: Global crises have become increasingly recurrent events that jeopardize public-private partnerships (PPPs). In this context, the purpose of this paper is to expose the PPP-crisis research agenda by combining bibliometric and network analyses. Design/methodology/approach: The PPP literature associated with global crises between the 2008 global financial crisis and 2022 was analyzed in three stages: (1) paper selection and screening for the inclusion/exclusion of articles relevant to this research, (2) semantic network development for examining thematic relationships among selected papers by considering the co-occurrence of keywords within the chosen studies and (3) calculation of network metrics for analysis. Findings: The paper identified six research avenues for the PPP-crisis agenda: public interest, relational governance, risk management, user-pay PPPs, crisis management and financial performance. The PPP-crisis literature has spread significantly in the last five years driven by the case study approaches on a national or regional basis. Conversely, non-crisis periods generate room to strengthen user-pay PPPs and relational governance. The pandemic and post-pandemic times shared the priorities of the 2008 financial crisis but also strengthened the management of the risks and the structural drivers of the global crisis. Originality/value: This study demonstrates that during global crisis periods, the public interest and financial performance gain relevance in a detriment of structural solutions to social legitimacy erosion of PPPs because of the urgency of giving tools to the public and private sectors to tackle the financial issues, which steer future issues for PPPs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: COVID-19; financial performance; public interest; relational governance; risk management; user-pay PPPs
Index terms: case study, public interest, governance, COVID-19, research agenda, global financial crisis, pandemic, network analysis, screening, partnership, private sector, risk management, crisis management, methodology, financial performance, legitimacy
Subjects: research methods, business analysis, health risk and incident analysis, management, financial risk, economic concepts, sociology, research management, partnership management, political science, industry analysis, business, risk assessment, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Organizational Design, Human Resources, International Construction, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here