Circularity: a workflow for reusing waste wind turbine blades

Kio, P N and Anumba, C (2024) Circularity: a workflow for reusing waste wind turbine blades. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 14(5), pp. 751-764. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: Wind energy has developed rapidly becoming a promising source of renewable energy. Although wind energy is described as clean energy, the problem of blade disposal has emerged from decommissioned wind turbines in the renewable energy sector, these blades manufactured from composite materials are almost impossible to recycle. Design/methodology/approach: This study proposed a methodological workflow for an educational approach toward accelerating the transition to a circular economy (CE) through a case study reusing wind turbine blade waste. The participants were undergraduate students. In the quantitative case study approach of students' coursework, innovative architectural reuse was the basis of the methodology for creatively reusing blade waste. Students reused the blades as building elements. Findings: The workflow could be beneficial to the renewable energy sector and the architecture, engineering and construction industry. The results show that the impact of creative reuse is positive as it reduces the energy consumed by conventional recycling processes, reduces carbon dioxide-equivalents and preserves the structural properties of the blades. Research limitations/implications: The research reported in this study is exploratory and findings may not be generalizable due to the location and limited number of participants in the design process. Also, the empirical data collected were limited to the views and opinions of the students and instructor. Originality/value: The novel workflow provided evidence at the end of the course that participating students became more interested in CE and were able to think more independently about CE. Creative reuse promotes circularity, reducing virgin material extraction and carbon emissions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: circular economy; design; education for sustainable development; higher education; life cycle analysis; sustainability; case study
Index terms: workflow, construction industry, renewable energy, undergraduate, methodology, evidence, life cycle analysis, circularity, carbon dioxide, sustainable development, recycling, higher education, circular economy, instructor, clean energy, recycle, carbon emission, becoming, composite, design process, case study
Subjects: energy systems, curriculum development, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, materials science, sustainable materials, waste management, environmental impact, design methods, practitioner, climate science, educational institutions, industry analysis, philosophical process, management, research methods, health safety and environment, sustainable design
Topics: Education, Design Practice, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here