Trust in the design team

Smyth, H (2005) Trust in the design team. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1(3), pp. 211-223. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to establish the extent to which design teams are co-operative in practice. The objective is to explore the extent to which co-operation, measured through the competence trust, is present within the design team, and between the client and design team. Trust is explored through a framework of trust, a survey proving data based on the framework. The data are sourced from the design team, real estate consultants and from one of the leading UK property developers undertaking a large multi-use redevelopment in a prominent location in the heart of London. The main findings are that there is a high level of overall trust, the levels increasing as other parties—namely the agents and client—are involved, which has wider lessons for collaborative working between all those responsible for delivering projects. The quantity surveyor/cost consultant has a professional role that inherently creates tensions in the relationships, giving rise to a need for them to develop a broader set of competencies beyond immediate professional requirements. There is also an indication that the organizations involved appear to rely on individuals taking responsibilities for the presence of trust, rather than taking opportunities to develop strategies and actions to facilitate trust.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: behaviour; coalition; competencies; design team; performance; relationships; strategic management; trust
Index terms: redevelopment, heart, agent, operative, strategic management, real estate, London, competence, presence, design team, strategy, survey, cost consultant, quantity surveying
Subjects: practitioner, profession, data collection methods, environmental science, professional practice, real estate economics, Geography, personnel development, management, medical science and clinical practice, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Urban Studies, Design Practice, Human Resources, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here