Retrofitting e-learning to an existing distance learning course: A case study

Allan, S; Jones, K and Walker, S (2006) Retrofitting e-learning to an existing distance learning course: A case study. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2(1-2), pp. 137-147. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The School of Architecture and Construction of the University of Greenwich has successfully delivered a range of distance learning programmes, mainly in Hong Kong, Malaysia and China, since the early 1990s. The method of delivery has been through paper-based study material and study weekends held twice a year at each centre. Recently, the distance learning market has become more fragmented, diverse and scattered with students expecting multimedia programme delivery. In 2003, the decision was taken to examine the potential of electronic teaching and learning systems to meet changing student expectations. This paper describes the experiences of the authors as they retrofitted an e-learning solution to an existing distance learning course. The paper, through the use of a case study methodology, critically reviews the various stages of the retrofitting process and highlights the key factors that affected its progress. The paper concludes that, while it was technically feasible to retrofit an e-learning solution to a traditional paper-based course, the trade-offs between the potential benefits and associated costs, and the need to clearly articulate these to other stakeholders in the distance learning programme, was a major inhibitor on both the scale and speed of development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: blended learning; curriculum development; e-learning; virtual learning environment
Index terms: curriculum development, retrofitting, China, e-learning, methodology, programme, case study, distance learning, Malaysia, Hong Kong
Subjects: curriculum development, data collection methods, project controls, educational technology, teaching methods, Geography, research methods, renovation and retrofit
Topics: Education, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here