Building regulations and disaster mitigation: The Philippines

Gavieta, R C and Onate, C E (1997) Building regulations and disaster mitigation: The Philippines. Building Research & Information, 25(2), pp. 120-123. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The present form of building regulations in the Philippines makes it difficult to enforce a strong programme mitigating the effects of earthquakes. This lack of enforcement is discussed and recommendations show that fundamental changes will have to be made. On average a major earthquake has occurred in the Philippines once every six years since the year 1600. The annual population growth is 2.3%, while there is an annual loss of about 2% of the Gross National Product due to natural disasters. One way of mitigating against the disasters is to have stronger enforcement and seek ways of accommodating change.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building regulations; enforcement; natural disaster; Philippines
Index terms: population, earthquake, disaster mitigation, enforcement, Philippines, building regulation, natural disaster, programme
Subjects: Geography, health safety and environment, environmental hazards, regulatory law, demography, project controls
Topics: Sustainability, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Time Control, Urban Studies, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here