A hybrid approach to house construction: a case study in Botswana

Ngowi, A B (1997) A hybrid approach to house construction: a case study in Botswana. Building Research & Information, 25(3), pp. 142-147. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This paper examines the strategy of employing a hybrid combination of indigenous and modern housing construction technologies. Using a Botswana village as a case study, this paper examines four traditional house types in relation to the household income, skills, materials and aspects which could be improved by adapting industrialized methods. Using experimental houses, the case study provides the costs, benefits, potential problems and implementation considerations. The paper discusses the weaknesses and virtues of traditional construction technologies, how appropriate aspects from modern technologies can be incorporated or adapted into traditional methods and the implications for developing appropriate, affordable housing technologies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: affordable housing; appropriate technology; human factors; hybrid construction; industrialized construction; traditional construction
Index terms: income, household, affordable housing, human factor, appropriate technology, industrialized construction, house construction, implementation, traditional construction, case study, Botswana, housing construction technology, strategy
Subjects: management, Geography, building construction, demography, occupational health and safety management, heritage and conservation, data collection methods, technological development, construction type, economic analysis, contractual arrangements
Topics: Design Practice, Urban Studies, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here