Proverbs, D G; Holt, G D and Olomolaiye, P O (1997) Factors influencing the choice of concrete supply methods. Building Research & Information, 25(3), pp. 176-184. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A survey of UK contractors' planning engineers was undertaken using an in situ framed building model to elicit comparable information. Rank ordering, correla-tions and exploratory factor analysis of the data confirm that cost is of primary consideration for UK contractors. However, quality is assuming an increasingly important role in the decision making process. A 'Quality Factor Group' is discussed as being the most significant underlying factor having a fundamental impact on the construction method chosen. This, based on the achievements of Japanese and American construction firms, could result in reduced costs and higher productivity in the future.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete supply; planning; UK high rise construction |
| Index terms: | concrete supply, in-situ, construction firm, survey, construction method, productivity, decision-making process, engineer, high-rise construction, exploratory factor analysis |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, decision analysis, building construction, management, construction logistics, profession, data collection methods, organization |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here