Pozzolanic properties of a variety of European clay bricks

Wild, S; Gailius, A; Hansen, H; Pederson, L and Szwabowski, J (1997) Pozzolanic properties of a variety of European clay bricks. Building Research & Information, 25(3), pp. 170-175. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Clay bricks from Britain, Denmark, Lithuania and Poland have been ground up, investigated and analysed for particle size distribution, chemical composition, mineralogical content and strength. The ground brick types have also been used to partially replace cement in mortar. Chemical tests for pozzolanic activity confirm that all the brick types investigated have good pozzolanic activity and this is supported by strength development data of the mortar bars. A significant variation in relative strength between mortars made with the different ground brick types and the reasons for this variation are discussed. The work reported involves potential utilization of waste clay bricks in the production of durable mortar and concrete.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cement reduction; clay bricks; concrete; mortars; pozzolans; utilization of waste
Index terms: mortars (material), Lithuania, pozzolan, Poland, variation, particle size, Denmark
Subjects: building materials, Geography, contractual condition, material properties and characteristics
Topics: Geographical Context, Contract Administration, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here