Dean, Y and Warwick, S (1998) Buildings, the suppression of seasonal response and the effects on health. Building Research & Information, 26(3), pp. 146-156. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The function of a building is to provide not just shelter and comfort, but to actively promote a healthy physiology. In reviewing the fields of environmental medicine and biometereology the authors propose that as buildings provide the main climate that people live in, this may affect seasonal response and could be a prime causal agent for ill health and 'sick building syndrome'. Flexible and seasonal changes of building use are introduced and parallels are drawn with marine environments for relearning physiological systems of adaptation. Conclusions include a rationale for looking at health problems within buildings by utilizing bodies of knowledge that already make useful links between climate and health. If this knowledge can be used as a predictive tool in the design and control of the built environment then it could make a significant impact on health and assist strategic decision-making in allocating resources towards an 'engineered' health care environment, as a major factor in primary health care.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | biometeorology; buildings; climate; environmental medicine; health; seasonal response; sick building syndrome |
| Index terms: | adaptation, decision-making, health care, built environment, comfort, medicine, agent, sick building syndrome |
| Subjects: | medical science and clinical practice, public and environmental health, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, decision analysis, practitioner, user focus |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Design Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here