Deb, A (1998) Sustainable cities in developing countries. Building Research & Information, 26(1), pp. 29-38. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Sustainable cities in developing countries are explored in relation to a complex web of linked issues at the macro, meso and micro level. The eco-system is but one of many considerations. This paper presents an overview of sustainable human settlements. Social equity and quality of life are placed within the context of defining factors including public policy, regulation and performance, finance, technological development and obsolescence, cultural heritage and tradition, management and operational activities, agricultural and land policies as well as redefining professional roles and education. The linkages between the defining factors must be better understood and radically rethought, integrated and managed if cities are to be made sustainable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; sustainable development; urban planning |
| Index terms: | urban planning, linkage, sustainable development, land, regulation, public policy, developing country, sustainable city, quality of life, obsolescence |
| Subjects: | political science, public policy, urban planning, business, public and environmental health, asset management, urban design, real estate economics, health safety and environment, development economics |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, International Construction, Health and Safety, Governance, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here