Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing

Gann, D M; Wang, Y and Hawkins, R (1998) Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. Building Research & Information, 26(5), pp. 280-296. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This paper addresses the impact of building regulations on constraints and drivers for innovation. It seeks to clarify whether a supposed shift from prescriptive to performance-based regulations has improved the environment for technical innovation in energy efficient housing in Britain. We argue that when 'performance-based' building regulations are treated as static sets of technical requirements, their effect is similar to more traditional prescriptive forms of regulation. A more progressive approach is possible in which regulations can be used as part of a portfolio of policies aimed at improving performance. In this mode, functional performance specifications can stimulate systemic innovation. A flexible 'performancebased' form of standard could provide firms with the freedom, market incentive and institutional frameworks within which to innovate. The process itself could lead to information sharing and cooperation but for this to be achieved, competitiveness and regulatory policies need to be co-ordinated better. Regulatory objectives and mechanisms for achieving them need to match. Regulations need to accommodate technical change at different levels in the production process, including new product development and systems integration.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; energy regulations; housing; performance-based regulations; technical innovation
Index terms: competitiveness, production process, systemic innovation, new product development, performance-based regulation, information sharing, building regulation, regulation, integration, performance specification, cooperation, housing, energy efficiency, performance-based
Subjects: organizational analysis, regulatory law, performance measurement, innovation studies, management, manufacturing engineering, market analysis, data exchange, construction type, political science, tendering, sustainability and energy, psychology
Topics: Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Legal Issues, Governance, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here