Selection and specification of building products: Implications for design managers

Emmitt, S (2006) Selection and specification of building products: Implications for design managers. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2(3), pp. 176-186. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The small amount of published work reporting on investigations into how designers specify has indicated that specifiers' behaviour is conservative when it comes to specifying products that are new to them; they tend to look for alternatives only when forced to do so. Early work on the behaviour of designers found that they tend to use rules of thumb and knowledge gained from experience to make decisions, rather than constantly referring to reference information. Indeed, there is a small body of literature that argues for better management of the specification process due to its effect on the constructability, cost and durability of the completed building. Investigation of specifiers' behaviour in the design office comprised three interlinked pieces of research conducted using quantitative and qualitative methods. The primary focus was on the adoption of new products and the management of the specification process. The way in which designers make decisions and the subsequent development and realization of design intent is reported and discussed. The findings help to illustrate some of the pressures faced by specifiers in a busy design office. It also highlights some of the challenges facing design managers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural practice; building products; constructability; decision-making; design management; innovation; specification
Index terms: decision-making, design management, architectural practice, investigation, constructability, design manager, specification, durability, designer, qualitative method
Subjects: decision analysis, contractual condition, design process, construction integration, material degradation and durability, data collection methods, profession, business, research design and methodology
Topics: Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Contract Administration, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here