Cole, R J (1999) Building environmental assessment methods: Clarifying intentions. Building Research & Information, 27(4-5), pp. 230-246. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The intentions for, and the thinking behind, the Green Building Challenge (GBC) assessment framework and its development are made explicit. This paper disentangles three separate roles for environmental assessment of buildings (stimulating owners to improve a building's performance, informing decision makers during the design stages and delivering objective measurements of a building's impact on natural systems). The author provides a number of significant lessons from the development exercise and discusses further implications and directions for developing environmental assessment methods for buildings. A distinction is made between 'green' and 'sustainable' agendas and their implications for the future development of building environmental assessment methods. This is essential in order to clarify the many roles and applications demanded of these tools. The considerable practical overlap between the 'green' and 'sustainable' agendas suggests that they can be reconciled within a single tool. 'Green' performance is most usefully described in relative terms in comparison to similar buildings in the region, while absolute energy and mass flows are a prerequisite for assessing progress towards sustainability. A fewer number of carefully elected performance measures are required to provide a measure of a building's role in ecological sustainability than to describe its green performance. The GBC process has clarified the roles and applications demanded of different tools and these lessons will be integrated into the restructuring and application of GBTool, and add significantly to the wider debate on environmental assessment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design tools; environmental assessment methods; feedback; green building challenge; labelling; sustainable development |
| Index terms: | sustainable development, building environmental assessment, performance measure, owner, exercise, environmental assessment, green building, design stage |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, health behaviours and lifestyles, professional practice, sustainability assessment, design practice, performance measurement, health safety and environment, sociology |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here