Gillott, M; Holland, R; Riffat, S and Fitchett, J A (2006) Post-occupancy evaluation of space use in a dwelling using RFID tracking. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2(4), pp. 273-288. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The UK housing industry stands accused of delivering homes that are overly expensive, environmentally unsustainable and deficient in number (Barker, 2004). To resolve the proclaimed shortage—primarily the result of demographic changes within households (Office for National Statistics, 2006)—the Government intends that the number of annual new additions in England by 2016 will have increased by a third to 200,000. The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) has stated that post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is the preferred means to assess how well these new homes meet the changing lifestyle needs of consumers and whether effective use is being made of the limited land resources (CABE, 2005). However, a standard approach for housing POE is yet to be developed. This paper describes a project in which a household's occupancy of each room in a dwelling was discreetly collected using a radio frequency identification (RFID) tracking system. This gave a temporal portrayal of how each space was used, occasionally contradicting the beliefs of the household. It is proposed that repeated studies like this could enable a POE database to be established that would make generalized conclusions possible. Alternatively, selective in-depth case studies could inform the line of questioning taken in traditional survey methods for gathering mass consumer opinions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | efficiency; housing; poe; post-occupancy evaluation; radio frequency identification; rfid; space |
| Index terms: | housing, land, statistics, built environment, household, lifestyle, database, survey, post-occupancy evaluation, radio frequency identification, case study, England, efficiency |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, data management, demography, Geography, performance management, evaluation methods, digital technology, real estate economics, construction type, data collection methods, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here