Horne, M; Hill, R and Giddings, R (1999) Visualization of photovoltaic clad buildings. Building Research & Information, 27(2), pp. 96-108. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The need to be able to visualize buildings is not new, and tools to aid architectural visualization have developed over the years, up to the current trends in computer-aided design. The emergence of complex building materials and an increase in the number of participants involved in the design process is placing more demands on visualization tools. The technology of photovoltaics, the conversion of solar energy to electricity, has resulted in the emergence of photovoltaics as a building material. Designs for photovoltaic clad buildings, new-build or refurbished, need to be viewed by client, architect, engineer, photovoltaic specialist and the public. Architects are concerned with aesthetics, engineers with structural and environmental performance. Clients are concerned with aesthetics, performance and cost. This paper investigates how computer-aided design technology can contribute to the visual assessment of photovoltaic clad buildings. Issues of computer representation and communication between interested parties in the design process are examined. Conclusions drawn are that widely used, low cost, commercially available software can contribute to the visualization of photovoltaic clad buildings, but issues are raised relating to the credibility and appropriateness of the end results of computer visualizations to meet the needs of interested parties. Areas for future research are outlined.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computer-aided design; design options; photovoltaics; software evaluation; visualization |
| Index terms: | architectural visualization, aesthetic, engineer, low cost, design process, environmental performance, solar energy, conversion, emergence, option, visualization, photovoltaic, computer aided design, architect, building material, placing |
| Subjects: | design practice, manufacturing engineering, concrete and cementitious materials, sustainability assessment, factor and component analysis, decision analysis, systems engineering, computational design, profession, design methods, building materials, bidding, energy systems |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here