Japanese expectations for green building assessments

Kimata, N (1999) Japanese expectations for green building assessments. Building Research & Information, 27(4-5), pp. 294-299. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The background and feedback on the Green Building Challenge '98 process in Japan is provided by a representative from one of two Japanese teams (representing the Building Constructors' Society). The positive process of validating and adapting the international criteria to particular national circumstances and then customizing these criteria is explained. Three significant benefits to the Japanese building industry are discussed: existing technologies and methodologies were validated, it was discovered that these have potential for world-wide application, the life expectancy of Japanese buildings needs to be lengthened. Future expectations from Japan include: the ongoing refinement of the international framework for the environmental assessment of buildings; the customization of criteria requires further structure and limits, a critical review of the customization process; an expansion embracing both developed and developing nations' new and existing buildings. The prototype green building assessment from GBC '98 has the potential to be refined and adopted as a world-wide methodology and is endorsed as the fastest way to achieve world-wide consensus.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: environmental assessment; feedback; green building challenge; Japan; longevity
Index terms: green building, methodology, building industry, environmental assessment, life expectancy, society, customization, customizing, developing nation, Japan, prototype
Subjects: environmental impact, construction manufacturing, modelling and simulation, Geography, development economics, design practice, research methods, industry analysis, communities and social development, demography
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, International Construction, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here