The significance of financial risks in BOT procurement

Lam, K C and Chow, W S (1999) The significance of financial risks in BOT procurement. Building Research & Information, 27(2), pp. 84-95. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

This paper explores the significance of the financial risk characteristics of Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) projects. The objective was to identify and discuss the significance of the types of financial risk variables in conjunction with the different phases of procurement. A survey was therefore conducted to investigate the nature of the relationships between the financial risk variables and the different phases of BOT projects. 'Interest rate fluctuation' was the most significant financial risk variable in the pre-investment phase. For the implementation phase, both the variables 'design deficiency' and 'time overrun' were found to be highly statistically significant. The variable 'time overrun' was found to be the most statistically significant in the construction phase. The majority of the risk variables were considered to be moderately significant in the operations phase; these included 'competition', 'currency exchange restrictions' and 'defective products or facilities'. A mathematical model employing discriminant analysis was established to demonstrate the classification of financial risk variables in relation to the five BOT project phases.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: build-operate-transfer projects; financial risk; Hong Kong; private finance; procurement; risk analysis
Index terms: interest rate, competition, build-operate-transfer, construction phase, risk analysis, implementation, discriminant analysis, Hong Kong, time overrun, mathematical model, private finance, survey
Subjects: project controls, market analysis, environmental hazards, statistical analysis, Geography, contractual arrangements, project delivery, economic analysis, data collection methods, mathematical modelling
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Procurement, Sustainability, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here