Factors in formwork selection: A comparative investigation

Proverbs, D G; Holt, G D and Olomolaiye, P O (1999) Factors in formwork selection: A comparative investigation. Building Research & Information, 27(2), pp. 109-119. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Results of an investigation concerning preferred methods of construction formwork by contractors' planning engineers in France, Germany and the UK are presented. Findings confirm differences amongst preferred solutions in these international locations. French and German contractors tend to employ similar proprietary formwork methods, whilst the UK 'stand alone' in preferring traditional timber solutions. It is found that company size has no significant impact on the formwork system selected. Nine formwork selection factors are identified, and ranked in terms of importance for each international group of contractors. Statistically, the rankings are shown to have significant correlation for each pair of countries. 'Relative costs', 'Specification (quality) of concrete' and 'Degree of repetition', are found to be the principal formwork selection criteria. Correlation analysis reveals association between many of these selection factors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete; contractors; Europe; formwork; planning
Index terms: selection criteria, investigation, Germany, formwork, engineer, correlation analysis, France, Europe, specification
Subjects: building construction, statistical analysis, physical geography and landforms, tendering, contractual condition, Geography, data collection methods, profession
Topics: Contract Administration, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here