Wei, H; Minggang, H and Qun, H (1999) Quasi-static testing of composite masonry construction. Building Research & Information, 27(2), pp. 120-123. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This paper introduces research into the effects of earthquakes on composite masonry and concrete buildings in China. The quasistatic test is used on a nine-storey composite masonry quarter-scale model. The structure is analysed under loads to assess structural ductility, power absorption ratio, damping, etc. Testing indicates important conclusions for architects and policy makers. Bending effects induced by earthquakes can be minimized and controlled by the design of the building's depth to width ratio. Composite masonry construction can be an appropriate technology for buildings of less than nine storeys in China's earthquake regions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; composite masonry; earthquake resistance; quasi-static testing |
| Index terms: | China, ductility, composite, architect, earthquake, testing, appropriate technology |
| Subjects: | Geography, environmental hazards, materials science, technological development, material properties and characteristics, professional practice, profession |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here