Gage, S A and Graham, J M R (2000) Static split duct roof ventilators. Building Research & Information, 28(4), pp. 234-244. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Split-duct roof ventilators or windcatchers are used to provide both supply and extract ventilation to the spaces which they serve. However, buildings are often erected in conditions where there is no prevailing wind direction. An investigation into four and six segment windcatchers to determine their relative performances under different wind conditions was undertaken usind scale models in a wind tunnel. Conclusions indiciate that six segment windcatchers have a more predictable, reliable performance in uncertain or variablewind conditions. However, a four segment windcatcher that is orientated 45 degrees to the prevailing wind will generate the highest pressure differences and consequently the highest duct speeds in an installation. Further work on strategies for windless conditions are summarized, and scope for further research is indicated.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alternative technology; ducts; natural ventilation; ventilators; wind |
| Index terms: | investigation, roof, tunnel, ventilation, strategy, alternative technology, natural ventilation |
| Subjects: | management, design practice, data collection methods, environmental engineering, factor and component analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, air quality |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here