Bordass, B; Cohen, R; Standeven, M and Leaman, A (2001) Assessing building performance in use 2: Technical performance of the Probe buildings. Building Research & Information, 29(2), pp. 103-113. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
From 1995-1999, the Probe series of post-occupancy studies reported individually on the performance of 16 buildings. This paper introduces the buildings - seven office, five educational and four other - and reviews aspects of their technical performance in a number of areas: building envelope and window design, heating, hot water and ventilation systems, artificial lighting, controls and operations and ICT (the energy and occupant surveys are reported in papers 3 and 4 of this series). The buildings are above average in performance for the UK - some exceptionally so - but nevertheless certain types of problem were widespread. Many buildings had poor airtightness and problems with controls, which sometimes seriously reduced occupant satisfaction and energy efficiency (which is discussed in more detail in paper 3). Important lessons for designers, owners, tenants and operators of buildings are described, based on feedback from Probe. For both old and new techniques and technologies there are frequently chronic, minor problems; often revealing the need to make components, systems and particularly their means of control more understandable to those using and operating them; to avoid unnecessary complication; for design to be appropriate to the management resources likely to be available to run the buildings; and for all but the simplest and most standardized buildings to have a period of 'sea trials' following completion in which performance is evaluated, problems fixed, and information collected for the benefit of the organizations concerned and of the whole industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | advanced natural ventilation; buildings; control systems; HVAC systems; lighting; performance; post-occupancy surveys; thermal capacity; UK; usability; window design |
| Index terms: | usability, owner, building performance, tenant, ventilation, survey, designer, energy efficiency, occupant survey, building envelope, window, natural ventilation, control system, occupant satisfaction |
| Subjects: | environmental engineering, quality assurance, sociology, monitoring and control, architectural elements, sustainability and energy, practitioner, profession, data collection methods, user-centered design, air quality |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here