Cohen, R; Standeven, M; Bordass, B and Leaman, A (2001) Assessing building performance in use 1: The Probe process. Building Research & Information, 29(2), pp. 85-102. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The Probe project, which started in 1995, has been a unique joint venture between the UK government (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions), a publisher and a research team. It has undertaken post-occupancy surveys of well-regarded new commercial and public buildings, typically 2-3 years after completion. The purpose was to provide feedback on generic and specific information on factors for success in the design, construction, operation and use of buildings, together with areas of difficulty and disappointment. This paper outlines the project and describes the survey methods used, and prospects for further development. It considers the opportunities for more widespread deployment of post-occupancy surveys as routine quality assurance measures for the building industry and its clients. Papers 2 to 4 in this series discuss the findings on technical performance, energy performance and occupant satisfaction. Paper 5 draws some general conclusions and considers their implications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building performance; continuous improvement; design factors; energy survey; feedback; occupant survey; performance indicators; post-occupancy assessment; UK |
| Index terms: | quality assurance, survey, building performance, continuous improvement, routine, joint venture, performance indicator, occupant survey, public building, energy performance, design factor, occupant satisfaction, building industry |
| Subjects: | performance measurement, design practice, performance management, sociology, industry analysis, quality assurance, construction type, data collection methods, user-centered design, business, energy systems |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here