Cole, R J (2001) Lessons learned, future directions and issues for GBC. Building Research & Information, 29(5), pp. 355-373. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Some key technical lessons from the Green Building Challenge (GBC) process over the past four years are examined and the future direction of these developments is considered. The GBC assessment method consists of the definition, structuring and scoring of a range of collectively agreed performance criteria - the GBC assessment framework, and the development of a software version to operationalize the framework - GBTool. This generic assessment method is designed to be customized and applied to different building types and cultural contexts. However, its development and testing has exposed numerous important conceptual and technical issues related to building environmental performance assessment. Additional features introduced in GBC 2000 - normalizing for occupancy, making context an explicit part of the assessment process, and a set of absolute environmental performance indicators - show considerable promise. The transformation of the GBC assessment framework into a sustainability assessment tool represents the most important issue in its future development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 'green' buildings; building assessment systems; building performance; environmental assessment methods; environmental performance; green building challenge; performance indicators; sustainable development; trends |
| Index terms: | environmental assessment, lessons learned, testing, environmental performance assessment, green building, transformation, building performance, sustainable development, performance indicator, building assessment, performance criteria, environmental performance, sustainability assessment |
| Subjects: | business, environmental impact, professional practice, performance management, design practice, sustainability assessment, performance measurement, professional development, health safety and environment, asset management, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here