Rousseau, D and Chen, Y (2001) Sustainability options for China's residential building sector. Building Research & Information, 29(4), pp. 293-301. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
China is engaged in a massive urban development programme, together with large infrastructure investments in road and transit systems. This development is occurring in the context of a shift towards a market economy, but China is still a developing country. China and the rest of the world are poised at a critical moment of decision. For China to provide an international standard of living for its entire population using the Western model of consumption would require vast resources. Many of these resources are relatively scarce in China, and the cost of imports at world prices is prohibitive for China. Furthermore, the future resource cost and impact on the environment of operating cities in China will be overwhelming if they are developed to conventional, Western standards. This has already been recognized for industry and utilities in China, where many modernizations and energy efficiency improvements have been made. However the residential sector, which is now the fastest growing sector in terms of ene rgy and materials demands, has not received sufficient attention. One option is to advance the 'sustainable design approach' based on highly efficient buildings, transportation systems and utilities, and preserving the productive capacity of land and restoring air and water quality. China has many resourceful traditions that can form a basis for a culturally specific approach to sustainability, but foreign assistance and technology transfer will be required, as well as Government policy incentives and their implementation within China. Especially needed are clean industry technology, durable and energy efficient building systems, renewable energy systems, and environmental cleanup and recycling systems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building materials; China; developing countries; governance; housing; public policy; sustainability; technology transfer; urban development |
| Index terms: | sustainable design, governance, renewable energy system, energy efficiency, residential building, developing country, infrastructure investment, programme, utilities, energy-efficient building system, import, recycling, water quality, urban development, building material, population, government policy, housing, option, technology transfer, consumption, land, implementation, public policy, China |
| Subjects: | occupational health, decision analysis, demography, project controls, development economics, urban design, design process, sustainable design, Geography, economic analysis, energy systems, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, public policy, building materials, sustainability and energy, real estate economics, waste management, consumer economics, business, construction type |
| Topics: | International Construction, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Time Control, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Governance, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here