Sha, K and Lin, S (2001) Reforming China's construction state-owned enterprises. Building Research & Information, 29(4), pp. 270-276. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Reform of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) constitutes the central link of the entire restructuring of China's construction industry. The poor performance of SOEs was mainly attributed to the lack of autonomy and the vagueness in the delineation of property rights. Reform measures have been undertaken to address these issues, but the achievements are far from satisfactory. The paradox of increasing productivity and declining profitability calls for a sound plan to solve the SOE problem by considering both the root causes and symptoms. The relationship between the provision of sufficient, robust information and the performance of SOEs is analysed and, based upon this, the implications for further restructuring are assessed. The proposed solutions may be summarized as: creating a fair business environment for competition to enable each SOE's profit level to be used as a simple, low-cost and sufficiently informative indicator of managerial performance; transforming the traditional, centralized operation model so that the restructuring of SOEs as well as the whole construction industry can be realized.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; economic reform; institutional reform; organizational reform; state-owned enterprise |
| Index terms: | property rights, competition, profitability, construction industry, China, paradox, productivity, profit |
| Subjects: | real estate economics, economic analysis, social theory and frameworks, market analysis, industry analysis, management, Geography |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here