Slaughter, E S (2001) Design strategies to increase building flexibility. Building Research & Information, 29(3), pp. 208-217. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
As the needs of owners and occupants change, buildings must be frequently renovated, resulting in significant cost and lost use of the buildings during the construction. This research develops a systematic approach to examine the nature of changes that can be expected to occur in built facilities, and analyses specific design strategies that can significantly increase the building flexibility, or ability to accommodate change. The three types of changes in a building are in its functions, the capacity of its systems, and the flow of the environment and people within and around the facility. Analysis of renovation projects reveals that buildings require more changes to all systems (i.e. structure, enclosure, services and interior finish) than is commonly assumed, and that the difficulty of these renovations is determined by the inter-relationships among the systems. The design strategies can provide a specific means to modify these interactions among the systems, and to more easily and efficiently accommodate changes during subsequent renovations. These design strategies increase the initial construction cost by less than 2% on average and usually decrease the original construction duration, and the majority of the strategies provide cost savings of 2% of the initial construction cost within the first renovation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; change; design strategies; facility management; flexibility; obsolescence; rehabilitation; renovation |
| Index terms: | adaptation, construction cost, strategy, owner, design strategy, enclosure, cost saving, duration, interaction, obsolescence, renovation |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, user focus, design methods, project controls, asset management, sociology, behavioral psychology, architectural elements, renovation and retrofit, management, economics |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here