Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the green building challenge

Todd, J A; Crawley, D; Geissler, S and Lindsey, G (2001) Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the green building challenge. Building Research & Information, 29(5), pp. 324-335. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Green Building Challenge (GBC) was intended to advance the state-of-the-art of building performance assessment, through the development, testing, and discussion of an assessment framework, criteria and tool. The contributions of GBC to building performance assessment are considered through comparing similarities and differences with a selection of available assessment tools. Unlike national or proprietary assessment systems, GBC was not designed for application to specific commercial markets. Instead, it emphasized research and involved researchers and practitioners from many countries. Consequently, GBC has been in a unique position to test and adopt new ideas and implement step changes. GBC's roles over the past five years have been to provide a reference framework, method and tools that can be used to develop new systems or improve existing systems; provide a forum for discussion among researchers and practitioners worldwide; and raise awareness and credibility of assessment systems. GBC's role has evolved as the context in which it operates has changed. Based on the analysis on GBC's specific characteristics and strengths, its potential future roles are found to reside in a unique position. Its role as a reference system has become less important to many participants as they implement their own national assessment systems. However, GBC's role as a forum and catalyst for change has taken on greater importance as researchers and practitioners continue to wrestle with the most difficult issues in building performance assessment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 'green' buildings; building assessment systems; building performance; environmental assessment; environmental assessment methods; green building challenge; international collaboration; knowledge transfer; trends
Index terms: testing, markets, environmental assessment, collaboration, knowledge transfer, practitioner, state of the art, green building, building performance, building assessment, environmental performance, step-change
Subjects: practitioner, innovation studies, environmental impact, research dissemination and communication, economic analysis, professional practice, management, sustainability assessment, design practice, quality assurance, asset management
Topics: Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here