Andersen, M (2002) Light distribution through advanced fenestration systems. Building Research & Information, 30(4), pp. 264-281. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Most energy-saving applications of advanced fenestration systems, e.g. solar blinds, novel types of glazing and daylight redirecting devices, require a precise knowledge of their directional light-transmission features. These photometric properties are described by a Bi-directional Transmission Distribution Function (BTDF), which is experimentally assessed by a bi-directional photogoniometer. As such a function represents a heavy amount of data, there is a need for a synthetic and intuitive visualization of a system's transmission behaviour. For this purpose, four kinds of graphical representations have been created and are presented in this paper. These are based on bi-directional data assessed by a novel digital imaging-based photogoniometer, whose measurement principle allows a continuous knowledge of the whole transmission space, and therefore an appreciable liberty in data processing. The geometric properties of the different representations are described, together with the corresponding image operations. The information extraction from these graphical visualizations is given through a comparison example between a conventional venetian blind and an optimized prototype.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bi-directional transmission distribution function; daylighting; digital imaging; energy; façades; light distribution; photometry; transmission; visual comfort; windows |
| Index terms: | graphical representation, daylighting, data processing, distribution function, glazing, prototype, window, visualization, visual comfort, energy-saving |
| Subjects: | architectural elements, modelling and simulation, design practice, environmental engineering, visualization, building performance, data science, probability and distributions, energy systems |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here