A vision and methodology for integrated sustainable urban development: Bequest

Bentivegna, V; Curwell, S; Deakin, M; Lombardi, P; Mitchell, G and Nijkamp, P (2002) A vision and methodology for integrated sustainable urban development: Bequest. Building Research & Information, 30(2), pp. 83-94. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The concepts and visions of sustainable development that have emerged in the post-Brundtland era are explored in terms laying the foundations for a common vision of sustainable urban development (SUD). The described vision and methodology for SUD resulted from the activities of an international network called BEQUEST, funded by the European Commission. The project involved building consensus over the language and vision of SUD across a wide range of stakeholders in the urban environment and across a range of spatial and temporal scales, development activities and environmental and social issues. The resulting vision of SUD is that of a relative, adaptive process in which the current urban fabric is gradually adapted over time to suit more sustainable lifestyles. A framework for structuring information on SUD has been developed which provides a unique, integrated representation of the scope and extent of the subject that links together socio-economic and technical dimensions as well as planning, property, design and construction interests, in time and space. Impediments to implementation of the vision and method are explored, including lack of demand, lack of capacity, absence of agreed targets and indicators together with other policy problems undermining full sustainability assessment and evaluation of urban re/development proposals.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment systems; built environment; cities; decision support system; good practice; planning; public policy; sustainable urban development; urban management
Index terms: built environment, design and construction, methodology, urban environment, dimension, foundations, urban fabric, public policy, implementation, decision support, sustainability assessment, proposal, good practice, lifestyle, sustainable urban development, sustainable development
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, demography, decision analysis, health safety and environment, sustainability assessment, performance measurement, structural engineering, research methods, urban form and morphology, contractual arrangements, project planning, health monitoring assessment and metrics, public policy, sustainability and resilience, urban sustainability
Topics: Risk Management, Procurement, Governance, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here