Devapriya, K A K and Ganesan, S (2002) Technology transfer through subcontracting in developing countries. Building Research & Information, 30(3), pp. 171-182. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Past discussions on technology transfer (TT) in construction have mainly focused on technology acquisition during the execution of projects involving an overseas party. This paper extends this discussion to the problems and prospects of internal transfer of technology within the domestic construction sector in order to boost indigenous construction capacity. Empirical evidence from subcontracting arrangements in Sri Lanka is used to test the theoretical analysis. The theoretical framework identifies three interdependent TT goals. Effective transfer of technology within the confines of single projects cannot be a major vehicle for TT to domestic industries as a whole unless advanced knowledge gained in such projects is effectively diffused within the domestic industry. Nevertheless, joint ventures and subcontracting arrangements involving foreign parties can be beneficial. For the effective internal transfer of technology, the design and construction systems employed in internationally managed projects should seek to facilitate the internal transfer of technology and thereby boost domestic construction capabilities. The possible approaches to achieve this outcome are considered in detail.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; innovation; joint ventures; management; Sri Lanka; subcontracting; technology transfer |
| Index terms: | domestic construction, developing country, subcontracting, evidence, Sri Lanka, technology transfer, joint venture, design and construction, acquisition |
| Subjects: | business, contractual arrangements, organization, knowledge management, evaluation and assessment methods, development economics, construction type, Geography |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, International Construction, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here