English, J (2002) Managing cultural differences to improve industrial efficiency. Building Research & Information, 30(3), pp. 196-204. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The construction industry is a microcosm of a country's socio-economic development. The stresses that the industry suffers are only increased in a country such as South Africa, with its broad sweep of cultures. The challenge in such an environment is to shift perceptions and attitudes that result in misunderstanding and loss of efficiency. The route to changing perceptions is through training supported by qualitative and quantitative feedback and assessment. Employees of a major construction company followed an in-house training programme comprising theoretical input on groups, management and culture, and experiential exercises based on the philosophy of ubuntu. There were follow-up interviews on site with participants and, two years later, assessments of participants' progress in the company. Employees representing three primary cultures (English, Xhosa, Afrikaans) and 28 secondary cultures (tribes), totalling 160 employees, were randomly chosen. They attended the programme in groups of 20-30 people. After the programme, meetings took place on five sites and at the head office to gather data on the extent of change in behaviour. The data showed that subjects who had attended the programme could cooperate across cultures more efficiently than who had not attended.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cross-cultural communications; efficiency; management; on-site relationships; training |
| Index terms: | construction industry, South Africa, efficiency, interview, economic development, exercise, cultural difference, philosophy, construction company, programme |
| Subjects: | project controls, cross-cultural studies, industry analysis, philosophical studies, economic development, performance management, Geography, data collection methods, organization, health behaviours and lifestyles |
| Topics: | International Construction, Quality Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here