Hamilton, A; Mitchell, G and Yli-Karjanmaa, S (2002) The BEQUEST toolkit: A decision support system for urban sustainability. Building Research & Information, 30(2), pp. 109-115. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A prototype decision support system for making informed decisions on urban development has been produced by the pan-European BEQUEST network. The overall aim is to enhance urban sustainability, the process of developing a built environment that meets peoples' needs whilst avoiding unacceptable social or environmental impacts. The system, called the BEQUEST toolkit, consists of modules that present advice on how to make urban development projects more sustainable, how to assess their sustainability and whom to contact for further advice. A glossary of terms related to sustainable urban development (SUD) as well as links to best practice examples and other additional information are also included in the toolkit. The system addresses the issues in a holistic manner and aims to bridge the various scales of urban development from whole urban regions down to buildings and their components and materials. The toolkit has been developed in collaboration with the project's Extranet, an advisory body of more than 100 mainly European professionals and researchers. This group has supported the development of the toolkit through participation in an iterative development process with the core BEQUEST team, addressing the structure of the toolkit and the information that it contains. The Extranet has also tested the system through the Internet, and provided feedback that has led to improvements in the navigational and presentational features of the toolkit and identified areas for future development. The system is a prototype but already demonstrates the usefulness that a full-scale version would possess.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cities; decision support system; evaluation; internet; sustainable development; urban development |
| Index terms: | decision support, prototype, sustainable development, sustainable urban development, best practice, collaboration, urban development, built environment, module, environmental impact, internet, toolkit |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, software systems, architectural elements, management, urban design, health safety and environment, sustainability and resilience, modelling and simulation, business, computing systems, environmental impact |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Risk Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here