Kumaraswamy, M M and Shrestha, G B (2002) Targeting 'technology exchange' for faster organizational and industry development. Building Research & Information, 30(3), pp. 183-195. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Effective transfers of core knowledge and essential skills from one region/country/organization to another are often advocated to accelerate long-term development. However, the successful transfers of technologies in general and construction technology in particular have often been restricted by various barriers. A common problem is that the 'transferor' will not devote special resources to effecting sustainable (rather than superficial) 'transfers' if only the 'transferee' is perceived to benefit from such Technology Transfers. However, a broader conceptualization of technology incorporates multiple dimensions/components of 'knowledge' and skills, including 'cultural', linguistic, logistic and 'networking' capacities. This broadened concept could convince both parties of mutual benefits to be derived through an 'exchange' of strengths in different components of such technologies. The paper is based on a survey of international literature on these issues, structured interviews and responses to a questionnaire issued to a cross-section of practitioners in Hong Kong. The foregoing paradox of Technology Transfers and the proposed paradigm of 'technology exchange' are discussed in terms of the construction industry. Construction Joint Ventures that have proliferated in many countries including Hong Kong are seen to be a suitable vehicle for facilitating such technology exchange. Appropriate policies and incentives at macro-(governmental), meso-(organizational) and micro- (project) levels are needed to empower and propel this process as part of an integrated strategy for the long-term development of construction organizations and industries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | capability building; construction industry development; developing countries; Hong Kong; innovation; joint ventures; public policy; technology exchange; technology transfer |
| Index terms: | survey, construction industry development, strategy, networking, joint venture, Hong Kong, construction organization, interview, developing country, paradox, construction technology, construction industry, public policy, technology transfer, dimension, practitioner, questionnaire, paradigm, industry development |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, management, education and knowledge transfer, Geography, development economics, communication, public policy, social theory and frameworks, knowledge management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, digital engineering, business, organization, practitioner |
| Topics: | Governance, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, International Construction, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here