Group assignments and teamwork skills development in postgraduate construction management studies

Zou, P X W and Darvish, H (2006) Group assignments and teamwork skills development in postgraduate construction management studies. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2(3), pp. 203-215. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

It is commonly agreed that teamwork is a fundamental skill of construction personnel and therefore construction management students must develop this skill during their studies. Group assignment has been put forward to help students in developing their teamwork skills. Although research in team learning and teamwork is abundant, team learning in terms of students' perceptions on group assignments in construction management studies has not been thoroughly investigated. Using a survey questionnaire, the benefits, problems, formation, process progression and assessment of the group assignments in postgraduate construction management education were investigated. Development of cooperation and communication skills and being exposed to a variety of ideas were considered the main benefits, while unfair assessment and the difficulty of arranging times for group meetings, as well as low quality work by some members, were the major problems. The students preferred to form groups themselves with three or four members in a group. They believed it was important to monitor the process of conducting group assignments and to assess each individual's contributions. A combination of group assignments and individual assignments was most preferred. It was concluded that while group assignments were important and provided opportunities for students to learn technical content, share ideas and develop teamwork, cooperation and communication skills, it was necessary to establish detailed assessment criteria that addressed the monitoring of the process, the individual contributions and the final submissions. The importance of the submission of individually completed works should not be disregarded.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment; construction management education; group assignment; process monitoring; team learning; teamwork
Index terms: skills development, construction personnel, construction management education, survey, teamwork, cooperation, communication skill, postgraduate, monitoring, questionnaire
Subjects: professional education, higher education, management, personnel development, psychology, data collection methods, workforce, control systems
Topics: Research Practice, Education, Organizational Design, Site Management, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here