Pietroforte, R and Miller, J B (2002) Procurement methods for us infrastructure: Historical perspectives and recent trends. Building Research & Information, 30(6), pp. 425-434. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This paper is concerned with emerging trends within the delivery systems and financing methods of public and private infrastructure projects in the US, and with the ongoing debate on public/private partnerships. Project delivery methods and more generally the procurement policies that currently drive the management of the US infrastructure system are explored. The historical evolution of government procurement policies of facilities indicates a wide variety of strategies including a dual-track procurement strategy that used a combination of different delivery methods and, in many instances, private financing. The methods ranged from the combined procurement of the design, construction, operation and maintenance of a facility, such as Design-Build-Operate (DBO) and Design-Build-Finance-Operate (known outside the US as 'BOT'), to the separate procurement of these services, such as Design-Bid-Building (DBB) and Design-Build (DB). In the last 50 years, there has been a shift toward the exclusive reliance on separate procurement such as DBB and the use of public funding. This approach is not sustainable financially, considering the widening gap between the availability of public funds and the increasing needs of the existing infrastructure system. Some drivers that foster a possible future shift in public procurement procedures are highlighted as well as the development of a more efficient infrastructure management practice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; business systems; construction business system; design-build; design-build-finance-operate; design-build-operate; infrastruc ture; life-cycle costs; maintenance; portfolio management; project delivery methods; public investment; public policy |
| Index terms: | evolution, funding, financing, project delivery, design-build-finance-operate, public policy, infrastructure project, infrastructure management, operation and maintenance, procurement method, procurement policy, portfolio management, procurement strategy, government procurement, building stock, delivery method, strategy, partnership |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, procurement strategy, asset management, delivery method, partnership management, infrastructure engineering, maintenance engineering, management, economic analysis, project delivery, contractual arrangements, environmental science, public policy |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here